Saturday, August 8, 2009

Longsword Class Drills & Games

Baton Striking with Edge Control Game (from Ochs: Longsword DVD)
One partner wears a mask and protective gloves.  He grips a baton in both hands so that there is at least 8” of space between them.  As he circles and moves, he will present the baton in front, or beside himself representing target openings.  The other partner strikes the baton with an appropriate strike, cut, or Master Strike.  Careful attention should be paid to range, staying in an appropriate guard, striking power, and edge placement.

Vier Leger Drill
Right Vom Tag -- Left Phlug -- Right Ochs -- Left Alber -- Right Langort -- pivot -- Left Vom Tag -- Right Phlug -- Left Ochs -- Right Alber -- Left Langort - pivot

Zwischen Leger Drill
Vom Tag - Kumphau -> Schrankhut - Unterhau -> Ochs - Zwerchau -> Phlug - Stich -> Kron - Oberhau -> Nebenhut - Zornhau -> Alber - short edge Unterhau -> pivot (Repeat on opposite side)

Fühlen Drill (from Fighting with the German Longsword)
Partners agree to a strike and counter-strike technique (I.e. Zornhau v. oberhau from the right).  The attacking partner then varies the degree to which he is “at the sword,” and the responding partner must use an appropriate technique based on the attacker’s level of commitment.  You will want to pre-plan the level of commitment the attacker will use at first.  Start slowly and carefully as this skill takes a lot of time and practice.

Guard Breaking Drill (from Ochs: Longsword DVD)
One partner adopts each of the Primary Guard positions, and the other partner responds with the appropriate Master Strike.  Partners alternate this role for each stroke.

Master Strikes Drills
Step through each Master Strike from right & left sides using ALL guard positions

Push Me, Pull You (from Schola St. George)
Each partner grips a sword handle in his right hand.  He then grips his partner’s sword blade about 8” from the tip in his left hand.  The players are now connected by two swords.  The goal is to push and pull on one, or both of the swords in an attempt to get the other player off balance.  This game may be played with stationary feet, or with both partners moving and circling.

Roman Focus Game
Using good hand protection, partners attempt to slap each other’s hands with the boffer dagger.  Only the hands are valid targets.  Both hands must stay in front of your body at all times.  Free advice: keep moving!

Striking Pattern Drill (from Ochs: Longsword DVD)
First set starts in Right Vom tag: UpR, LowL, LowR, UpL
Second set starts in Right Nebenhut: LowR, UpL, UpR, LowL
Third set starts in Left Vom tag: UpL, LowR, LowL, Upr
Fourth set starts in Left Nebenhut: LowL, UpR, UpL, LowR

Thrust Targeting Game (from Ochs: Longsword DVD)
This game is just like the Baton Striking game, but uses thrusting target as the focus.

Winden Drill: Clockwise & Counter-Clockwise (from Ochs: Longsword DVD)
Work large circles moving through the eight windings clockwise and counter-clockwise.  Keep pressure on the blades, and maneuver toward a position from which a good thrust could be executed.

Winden Game
Using boffer swords, masks and gloves, partners attempt to wind against each other in order to execute a thrust from the bind.  The swords should remain in a bind at all times, and players may not step out of range at any time.

Kali Drills
Sombrata
Down & Back

Heaven’s Six

Saturday, November 8, 2008

Bono At The Nobel Peace Summit in 2008

Nobel winners were meeting in Paris for a three-day summit, coinciding with celebrations marking 60 years since the UN declaration of human rights was adopted in Paris. They said Bono was chosen for the award for his global campaigning to persuade rich nations to cut Africa’s debt burden, combat poverty, promote fair trade and raise funds for the treatment of HIV-AIDS and malaria.

“We decided to nominate a man who has given a lot and will continue to give a great deal to the struggle for human rights, to the fight against poverty, with his music and with his words,” said Italian politician Walter Veltroni, co-host of the event. “He has put pressure on the world’s governments to reach the UN’s Millennium Goals. To give him the prize, is to say that fight will carry on.”

Here’s how Bono accepted the award:

‘The Man of Peace Award… come on…. let’s be honest… we all know this is as close as I’m going to get to the real thing… so I am holding on tight to this …

Seriously though… I am really honoured to be here… to accept this award from all of you… thank you for taking me seriously… because that’s not a given when you’re a rockstar. Even worse, a rock star with a conscience …..spare me.

The ONE campaign, the organization that I represent when working on these issues is very serious by the way….

Deadly serious, thanks to support from people like Bill and Melinda Gates and John Doerr and Susie Buffett who fund our organization and our work…

And the world’s poor deserve seriousness… they deserve the best representation in the world’s capitals – they deserve their own interest group, their own powerful lobby…

The US gun lobby spends nearly $200 million dollars a year making sure you can’t get elected if you support gun control.

Tobacco companies spend $19 million on lobbying Congress

The world’s poor deserve more than that.

For them it’s quite literally life and death. 4000 people dying every day of a preventable treatable disease… HIV/AIDS, 10,000 dying every day of a mosquito bite… 5000 children dying every day of diarrhea…

I mean, diarrhea can be a problem in our house, but it is not a death sentence….

So that’s why we set up the ONE campaign…I think our voices were heard during the presidential campaign in the US.

Did you notice that neither Barack Obama or John McCain ever once criticized aid, never used it as a pawn… Despite the huge economic crisis, Barack Obama has made a bold promise to double aid to Africa… part of the reason for this, I believe, is the 2 million members of the ONE campaign that we have in America… they showed up at every town hall meeting during the elections… making sure the candidates knew that this stuff mattered to them.

And you know that it’s not just Obama himself that’s committed… its his whole team… even his security team…the tough guys.

On the way here yesterday, I got to thinking about this guy Alfred Nobel – what an incredible guy – then I thought – hang on a second… isn’t he the guy that invented dynamite…?

I know it’s a bit of a cliché to talk about Nobel and dynamite.

But it is a funny thing, that it’s the people who know the real cost of war that fight hardest for peace…

I’ve been working on these issues of extreme poverty for quite a while…maybe 10 years now… when I started, I never would have expected a phone call from the head of NATO, General Jim Jones – who will soon be President Obama’s national security advisor.

He’s an extraordinary man. A six foot three gentle giant.

He said to me we have billions of dollars of high tech equipment floating in the Mediterranean Sea and yet we are losing to Hezbollah because they are building schools…

And then he said, I’m a marine… the men and women of the marine corps don’t mind being shot at for the right reasons but they do not like being shot at for being the wrong reasons – I asked what the wrong reason were – he said, for being American…

That sent a chill down me… I mean, this was America we were talking about… America that liberated Europe after the second world war, America that wiped out smallpox and polio… America that created the Peace Corps… and they are being attacked because they are American?

But America is about to present a new face to the world. Barack Obama, Jim Jones, and the person who said this: ‘Instability and extremism fester in places where infrastructure, education and opportunity are lacking… The battlespace goes far beyond the battlefield.’

That’s the next Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton.

‘Security, stability and development go hand-in-hand.’

Who said that? That one’s Robert Gates, the US Secretary of Defense, present and future.

There’s new thinking in America… a reimagining of how to deal with some of the greatest challenges of our time… things like extreme climate change… extreme ideologies… and extreme poverty, which is entangled with both.

With a new US administration taking the reins, where does Europe stand on all this? Europe that has long led the world on development issues? Well, let’s not be left behind….

We do see great leadership from Spain… Zapatero is keeping his promise…

We see great leadership from the UK….

Great leadership from Germany… a country that, for the last almost the last 20 years… spent 4 % of GDP on reunification…

Where does France stand, a long time champion on global health, and you could argue, joined at the hip and the heart to africa through its history? Truthfully? France isn’t quite doing its bit against the promises made… and we’re not sure why, because we are pretty sure the french people do care about this stuff. Carla Sarkozy certainly does… she’s just been named ambassador for the Global AIDS fund… and apparently… rumour has it, she sleeps with the President… he has spoken passionately about these issues, but we might need her to do a bit of pick pocketing… France is not however slashing its aid budget…which is what its next door neighbour Italy is doing…what an embarrassment for the next chair of the G8 to be slashing its aid budget.

And today, not far away from here… President Sarkozy and the rest of the European heads of state are trying to figure out where they stand on the link between extreme climate and extreme poverty… will a new grand bargain take shape under which, the people who created the problem of climate change (us) will make sure the people worst affected (the poorest of the poor) benefit financially from a new carbon deal.

Now there’s a bold idea. You know I think that Europe is a thought that needs to become a feeling. I get the sense that for many europeans, europe is defined by geography and bureaucracy. I think it’s through working together on bold projects like this, looking outside of ourselves, that we can start to really feel Europe—what it means, what it’s about, the big idea.

I know I am saying all of this at a time when financial markets are melting down and I might sound like I never read a newspaper … but it is in troubled times, when times for ourselves are toughest, that we reveal who we really are. Do we baton down the hatches and protect our own, or do we join forces and make sure the most vunerable are not forgotton. Do we dwell on the problems, or the solutions. Because in troubled times, I’d argue precisely what we should be doing is looking for new ways to fix old problems.

Just look around this room… the people in this room – you’ve all come out of conflict is the truth… you’ve all seen opportunity in moments of crisis…

Just think about Europe at the end of World War II.

Germany was in ruins. Britain, penniless. France, been starved and suffocated. Economies, hopes, the future seemed wrecked.

And through the wreckage walked giants. De Gaulle, Monnet. Churchill, Keynes. Truman, Marshall, Adenauer. Amid the ruins, they could see a path to a more broadly shared peace and prosperity. And that’s what they built—a post-war order of security and opportunity that endured for half a century.

Out of that conflict came the Declaration of Human Rights… 60 years ago this week. But its basic ideas were older than that.

On the ruins, they built a new world. They envisioned it, and then they built it to last.

That was their wisdom.

What is ours?

Look we all know it… we’re at a moment in time here, just like after the first world war when the league of nations was set up, just like after the second world war when the UN and the World Bank and the IMF were formed… the world is up for grabs…a system that has benefited the lucky few and excluded the unlucky many is under the microscope… Soon to be on the operating table. New ideas are in play. Creativity is needed. all the creativity in this room…

It raises eyebrows, fists even, when musicians enter these debates….it is unusual but it shouldn’t be… I may be biased but I think we need all disciplines (art, commerce, fashion, science) as well as politics to converge on these challenges.

Sometimes it takes crisis to reimagine the world and what we are capable of… To shake up the established order. To make old, bad ideas look ridiculous.

In fact, history has a way of making ideas that were once acceptable look ridiculous…

You know that… Willem de Klerk… you worked side by side with Nelson Mandela to figure out a new future for South Africa…

Who would have thought in our lifetime there would be peace in Northern Ireland? You did John Hume – you did Betty Williams – you did Mairead Maguire.

Who would have thought that there was to be a peaceful way out of the cold war and the spectre of mutually assured destruction… MAD madness…? Mikhail Gorbachev knew that… and we’re missing the great man here today…

As I said, what is our wisdom. Could it be that we decide it is no longer acceptable that an accident of geography—where you are born—can decide whether you live or whether you die… that we decide that human rights, the right to live like a human, belong not just to those who live in the comfort of their freedom. I think so but we haven’t quite got there yet.

But with your help, we might get there soon.

Since the start of the 21st century, just 8 years ago, many millions more African children are in school, millions on life-saving ARVs, millions protected from malaria by bed nets. Momentum is building. Energies are converging. The wheels of change are turning and the people in this room are living proof that we can alter their direction.

You know, this is not a burden, this is an adventure. Its exciting. Together we can make the insanity and injustice and inequality of extreme stupid poverty look ridiculous… a child dying in a world of plenty for lack of food in its belly… Death by mosquito bite or dirty water… These things we can consign to the ash heap of history… and write a new history which makes us all proud.

Merci beaucoup….’

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

Historical Fighting Manuals and SCA Armored Combat

It’s All In There
I have fought for nearly three decades in the SCA, and have only lately gotten serious about researching and re-creating the combat material in the period historical manuals.  Therefore, it is fairly safe to say that I feel a certain comfort, and even expertise with the former and not the latter.

Within the context of the SCA’s sport fighting, I’ve learned a lot of neat ‘tricks and techniques’ over the years. There are ‘shots’ that we have developed and taught to each other that seem, to us, like great discoveries.  Some of these ‘shots’ can even make some people seem nearly unbeatable.

My own “J-hook” comes immediately to mind.  This is a shot that I use with various two-handed thrusting weapons such as spear, glaive and two-handed sword.  The shot begins by standing in an extended middle guard, with the weapon’s point aimed directly at the opponent’s face/chest.  This invites him to slap the point aside, and follow it up with a charge into close quarters.  But when he moves to slap my weapon, I drop the point downward just enough to curve beneath his hands, move my tip around to the opposite side, and bring the point back upward and into his abdomen.  This works great nearly every time unless he is specifically watching for it.

In Hanko Dobringer’s 1389 fechtbuch, this exact maneuver is called the Pfobenzagel, Peacock’s tail.  It is executed from the langort guard, and discussed in the Sprechfenster section of his work.

This is but one example of many.  The deeper I go into Liechtenhauer’s material, the more I find that we thought we had discovered in our 40+ years of sweaty research and experimentation.  This natural re-development of techniques is based on the fact that certain implements work best with human body mechanics when used in certain ways.  Zucken, Schnappen and Durchwechseln are other glaring examples of techniques that have naturally developed within SCA fighting over time.

I guess what this really says to me, is that while we have been merrily reinventing the wheel, we have generally been on the right track.

Biggest Problem: The SCA’s Rules
Within the SCA there are some very serious skeptics about this stuff.  With our current level of research and skill with this stuff, it all seems pretty rudimentary and/or gimicky to the skilled fighters of the SCA.

Fighting in the SCA is a sport- a pretty rough one, but still a sport.  It has a quirky set of rules that compromises a certain level of realism for participant safety, and in some cases SCA tradition.  

The biggest factor affecting text-based Historical European Martial Arts acceptance into the SCA fighting community is its own armor standards.  Acceptance of blows in an SCA fight are based on a number of factors, all of which tend to force very strong blows to be thrown.  No draw or push cuts are ever accepted, and any sort of perceived deflection nullifies all blows, no matter their strength at the time they land.

Many historical fight manuals include techniques for fighting in armor.  These techniques correctly assume the virtually complete effective protection of plate and mail armor.  Thus, the techniques involve a level of ‘action’ that is just too extreme for the SCA’s safety conventions.  Grappling, tripping, and the twisting of joints are key aspects of these techniques, none of which are allowed in the SCA.

What most members of the SCA have seen of historical fighting is, by and large, the unarmored fighting plays.  The unarmored portion of this statement is very important.  Many of these plays involve non-lethal fight ending resolutions.  Other than death, a fight ender can be a deep, painful, or heavily bleeding wound; or a twisted, dislocated, or broken joint; or being disarmed, tripped, or momentarily dazed; or any other way in which you can gain long enough advantage over your opponent to put your point to his throat and call for his immediate abandonment of action.  Of these fight enders, the only ones really used by the SCA are death, deep wounds, smashed joints, and momentarily dazed.  Many of the deep wounds result in the unrealistic condition of fighting on without the use of affected limbs.

But Will It Work in the SCA?
In short, I believe that there is a middle ground.  Due to the amount of ‘SCA-valid’ fighting techniques already unearthed in the manuals, I think the rest of the manuals bear a closer inspection by fighting members of the SCA.

Specifically, I believe the Five Master Strikes and their associated plays deserve a much, much closer look.  These strikes are not mere gimmicks, they are different ways of swinging a sword.

Of the Five Master Strikes, The SCA has naturally re-developed two and a half.  The strikes known, and used by the SCA are the Zornhau, the Scheitlhau, and portions of the Zwerchau.

Briefly, from the SCA’s perspective:

-Zornhau: clearing your opponent’s weapon/guard with power to make space for your own plays.

-Scheitlhau: reaching over the top of an opponents guard to strike him.

-Zwerchau: reaching around the side of an opponent’s guard to strike him with the short edge of the weapon- the wrap-around.  The gathering portions of this strike are not used, because this action would count as a deflection under the SCA’s rules despite the power and accuracy with which the blow lands.

This leaves the Krumphau and the Schielhau for the SCA to naturally re-develop.  As with the gathering of the guard portions of the Zwerchau, both of these strikes have obstacles to overcome.  

The Schielhau is designed to land on an opponent’s shoulder/neck area, and lead into a draw or push cut.  The only fix for this blow is to land it with much more power.  Based on the body mechanics of landing this blow, I see this a quite a large challenge to do.

The Krumphau primarily targets the opponent’s hands- a blow that is illegal, and thus, completely ignored when struck.  A simple fix here is to target the forearms rather than the hands.

Why Do I Care?

I guess I’ve become kind of passionate about studying the historical manuals.  I know it’s hard to recreate something this physical from words written in an archaic form of a different language, but I see it as work worth doing.  It is by far not about trying to convert this stuff to the SCA for me.  I think I have the more pragmatic view that both of these activities need to be closely looked at as I work toward a more complete understanding our European fighting culture.

Monday, May 15, 2006

Strength v Weakness

This line/philosophy unlocks the Leichtenhauer system when it is fully understood.   Longsword fighting traditions rely heavily on body and sword mechanics.  Understanding the principals of those mechanics is absolutely key to beginning to understand the fighting system as an entire system.

First, some key concepts

The Basic Principle
If he commits to an action with strength- recognize what he is doing, and give-in (show weakness).  In giving-in however, transform his strong commitment to his action into an opening, and attack it.

If he shows weakness in an action, a bind for example, push through that weakness, and transform it into an opening.

The Sword’s Three Axis
Edge: The first is the edge axis which aligns with the edge and the cross.  When swinging the sword with the intention of cutting, the blade is traveling along its edge axis.

Flat: The second is the flat axis and describes the flat part of the sword’s blade.  The blade travels through its flat axis on some blocks and parries.

Length: The third axis is the length and runs right down the center of the blade from the point to the pommel.  A sword travels along its length axis when thrusting with the point.
Generally, strength is applied to either the long axis in a thrust with point or pommel, or the edge axis in a strike or cut.  The flat axis is usually only used in a bind situation.

Simple Physics
Lever and Fulcrum: If the sword is a lever, and the grip is the fulcrum, then simple physics tells us the the farther along the length of the lever that force is applied, the easier it is to move the lever by forcing the fulcrum to pivot.

Skeletal//Muscular Alignment & The Cross
Imagine the position of your body when you do any strenuous, strength activity.  Push starting a car for example: you push with all of your muscle groups and joints aligned, and working as one.  You must coordinate your stepping motion and body alignment to maximize your power.

Your body has aspects to it that are strong and weak.  Imagine pushing the car again.  You are incredibly strong along your forward/backward axis during the exertion, but you would fall right over if any perpendicular force were applied to you.

If these two axis were viewed as straight lines, they would form a cross.  Always remember how enchanted with cross imagery the medieval mind was.  These elements were included into their daily philosophies as much as possible.

These strong and weak aspects are always with you- and your opponent.  Whenever your opponent is strong, there is always a corresponding weakness.  Often, the location of the weakness is in some way perpendicular to the strength.  All you have to do is find it!

Longsword Grips
The Standard Sword Grip: Along the axis of the sword in line with the arm bones is found the strong of the sword. In the standard grip this is referring to the lowest half of the sword edge pointing away from you.  This is referred to as the long edge.  The upper half of the long edge is referred to as the weak part of the sword because it is more easily levered.  The physics of the inside, or short edge, are identical to the outside, but the short edge is weaker, in general, than the long edge.  When the sword is swung in this grip, the edge is aligned and powered with the top of the wrist pushing forward.  This motion is the most powerful.

The Thumb Grip: This grip is adopted when the sword is twisted 90º in the hands from the standard grip, and the thumb placed along the blade.  This grip retains both long, and short edges, but they are much weaker than in the standard grip.  When the sword is swung in this grip, the edge is aligned and powered with the top of the wrist rotating with a windshield-wiper motion.

Grip Strength:  When the sword is held in the hands in either fighting grip, it has a strong and a weak aspect.  To simplify, imagine holding a sword in front of you in the standard grip.  The grip is strongest along its edge axis, and very weak along its flat axis.

Putting It Together: Some examples . . .
Go back to the line, “Meet weakness with strength, and strength with weakness.”

Three of the Master Strikes (krumphau, zwerchau and scheilhau) depend of these principals in a very interesting way.  The strikes meet the strength of an oncoming edge, by attacking and displacing it on the perpendicular: on its weak, flat axis.  Once the foe’s blade is set aside in this way, the master strike transforms (winds) around the sword’s long axis in some way, and becomes an offensive strike that comes from an angle that is difficult to counter- hence the name “master strike.”

Taking off at the sword (Abnehmen) also makes interesting use of these principals.  In a bind, if your foe is pressing hard against your blade with outward pressure, then take off.  The sudden lack of counter-pressure against his sword causes him to fly outward, and creates openings all along his opposite side.  Meet strength with weakness.

Thursday, May 4, 2006

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

On December 10, 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the full text of which appears in the following pages. Following this historic act the Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and “to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories.”

PREAMBLE

    Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

    Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,

    Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,

    Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,

    Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

    Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

    Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,

Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.

Article 1.

    All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2.

    Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 3.

    Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Article 4.

    No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

Article 5.

    No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Article 6.

    Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7.

    All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8.

    Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Article 9.

    No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Article 10.

    Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Article 11.

    (1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.

    (2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.

Article 12.

    No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 13.

    (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.

    (2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 14.

    (1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.

    (2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 15.

    (1) Everyone has the right to a nationality.

    (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

Article 16.

    (1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.

    (2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.

    (3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

Article 17.

    (1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.

    (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 18.

    Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19.

    Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Article 20.

    (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

    (2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

Article 21.

    (1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.

    (2) Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.

    (3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.

Article 22.

    Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

Article 23.

    (1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.

    (2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.

    (3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.

    (4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

Article 24.

    Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

Article 25.

    (1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

    (2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

Article 26.

    (1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.

    (2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.

    (3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

Article 27.

    (1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.

    (2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.

Article 28.

    Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29.

    (1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.

    (2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.

    (3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 30.

    Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.

Monday, May 1, 2006

Abnemen

In the Zornhau plays, Liechtenauer says when your thrust from below (phlug position) is pushed away with strength, to “Take off high without driving.”

Ringeck comments on this, “... pull your sword upwards, away from his.  And then strike to the head from the other side, along his blade.”

In the Goliath text, the commentary says, “then wrench off from his sword (note in margin: take off high) high above you with your sword on his sword's blade, and strike one to his other side, still again on his sword's blade, to his head, this is called taking off high.”

Christian Tobler, on Ringeck, interprets this as more of a zucken (twitch).  He shows1 pulling up and away to the right, stepping left, and arcing the sword around to the left side of the foe’s sword to strike on the left side of the head at a fairly horizontal angle.

David Lindholm, on Ringeck, shows2 a much more vertical lifting of the sword, followed by an immediate step left, and a vertical cut right back down onto his head.

In the Ochs video3, a strike much like the Lindholm technique is shown clearly.

Having experimented with this technique at speed, and examining the various texts over and over, I tend to think that Linholm and Ochs have it right.  Ringeck and Goliath both mention staying on,  or along his blade on the vertical down strike.  In his book Tobler pulls completely away from the foe’s blade when he swings in an arc to the side of the foe’s head.  I have no quarrel that Tobler’s technique also works very well, but I now argue his interpretation in light of the text.

Further Research: April 29, 2006: Christian Tobler does have another sequence of plates4 later on that shows ‘taking off’ a little better, but he still does not bring his strike quickly and vertically down.  He has another sequence that fits better with Lindholm and Ochs interpretations in his book: Fighting with the German Longsword5.  I have to wonder whether he revised, or added to his thinking on this.  Perhaps the photos in the Secrets book were merely incomplete as this does seem to be a rather simple, straight forward interpretation.

To counter this technique, Ringeck writes, “When you engage at the sword with strength and your adversary pulls his sword upwards and strikes at your head from the other side then bind strongly with the true edge and strike him on the head.”

I have interpreted this as follows.  As he lifts his sword high- “takes off”- turn your knuckles out toward his left side, and drive hard into the flat side of his blade as he comes back down- stepping in as you do so.  You should bind against/gather his blade as close to you quillons as possible.  The force of your blow to the flat of his blade will drive it out of the way, and your blade will drive into the side of his head.


Footnotes:
1. p24-25, Secrets of German Medieval Swordsmanship, 2001, Chivalry Bookshelf.
2. p36-37, Sigmund Ringeck’s Knightly Art of the Longsword, 2003, Paladin Press.
3. Abnehmen Chapter, The Longsword of Johannes Liechtenauer: Part 1, DVD by Hans Heim and Alex Kiermeyer, 2005, Agilitas.tv and Chivalry Bookshelf
4. Plates 3.22-3.24, p33, Secrets of German Medieval Swordsmanship, 2001, Chivalry Bookshelf.
5. Illustration 9.3, page 99, Fighting with the German Longsword, 2004, Chivalry Bookshelf.

Monday, February 6, 2006

Bono at the National Prayer Breakfast, 2/6/2006


Mr. President, First Lady, King Abdullah, Other heads of State, Members of Congress, distinguished guests …

Please join me in praying that I don’t say something we’ll all regret.

That was for the FCC.

If you’re wondering what I’m doing here, at a prayer breakfast, well, so am I. I’m certainly not here as a man of the cloth, unless that cloth is leather. It’s certainly not because I’m a rock star. Which leaves one possible explanation: I’m here because I’ve got a messianic complex.

Yes, it’s true. And for anyone who knows me, it’s hardly a revelation.

Well, I’m the first to admit that there’s something unnatural… something unseemly… about rock stars mounting the pulpit and preaching at presidents, and then disappearing to their villas in the South of France. Talk about a fish out of water. It was weird enough when Jesse Helms showed up at a U2 concert… but this is really weird, isn’t it?

You know, one of the things I love about this country is its separation of church and state. Although I have to say: in inviting me here, both church and state have been separated from something else completely: their mind. .

Mr. President, are you sure about this?

It’s very humbling and I will try to keep my homily brief. But be warned—I’m Irish.

I’d like to talk about the laws of man, here in this city where those laws are written. And I’d like to talk about higher laws. It would be great to assume that the one serves the other; that the laws of man serve these higher laws… but of course, they don’t always. And I presume that, in a sense, is why you’re here.

I presume the reason for this gathering is that all of us here—Muslims, Jews, Christians—all are searching our souls for how to better serve our family, our community, our nation, our God.

I know I am. Searching, I mean. And that, I suppose, is what led me here, too.

Yes, it’s odd, having a rock star here—but maybe it’s odder for me than for you. You see, I avoided religious people most of my life. Maybe it had something to do with having a father who was Protestant and a mother who was Catholic in a country where the line between the two was, quite literally, a battle line. Where the line between church and state was… well, a little blurry, and hard to see.

I remember how my mother would bring us to chapel on Sundays… and my father used to wait outside. One of the things that I picked up from my father and my mother was the sense that religion often gets in the way of God.

For me, at least, it got in the way. Seeing what religious people, in the name of God, did to my native land… and in this country, seeing God’s second-hand car salesmen on the cable TV channels, offering indulgences for cash… in fact, all over the world, seeing the self-righteousness roll down like a mighty stream from certain corners of the religious establishment…

I must confess, I changed the channel. I wanted my MTV.

Even though I was a believer.

Perhaps because I was a believer.

I was cynical… not about God, but about God’s politics. (There you are, Jim.)

Then, in 1997, a couple of eccentric, septuagenarian British Christians went and ruined my shtick—my reproachfulness. They did it by describing the Millennium, the year 2000, as a Jubilee year, as an opportunity to cancel the chronic debts of the world’s poorest people. They had the audacity to renew the Lord’s call—and were joined by Pope John Paul II, who, from an Irish half-Catholic’s point of view, may have had a more direct line to the Almighty.

‘Jubilee'—why 'Jubilee’?

What was this year of Jubilee, this year of our Lords favor?

I’d always read the Scriptures, even the obscure stuff. There it was in Leviticus (25:35)…

'If your brother becomes poor,’ the Scriptures say, 'and cannot maintain himself… you shall maintain him… You shall not lend him your money at interest, not give him your food for profit.’

It is such an important idea, Jubilee, that Jesus begins his ministry with this. Jesus is a young man, he’s met with the rabbis, impressed everyone, people are talking. The elders say, he’s a clever guy, this Jesus, but he hasn’t done much… yet. He hasn’t spoken in public before…

When he does, is first words are from Isaiah: 'The Spirit of the Lord is upon me,’ he says, 'because He has anointed me to preach good news to the poor.’ And Jesus proclaims the year of the Lord’s favour, the year of Jubilee. (Luke 4:18)

What he was really talking about was an era of grace—and we’re still in it.

So fast-forward 2,000 years. That same thought, grace, was made incarnate—in a movement of all kinds of people. It wasn’t a bless-me club… it wasn’t a holy huddle. These religious guys were willing to get out in the streets, get their boots dirty, wave the placards, follow their convictions with actions… making it really hard for people like me to keep their distance. It was amazing. I almost started to like these church people.

But then my cynicism got another helping hand.

It was what Colin Powell, a five-star general, called the greatest W.M.D. of them all: a tiny little virus called A.I.D.S. And the religious community, in large part, missed it. The one’s that didn’t miss it could only see it as divine retribution for bad behaviour. Even on children… Even fastest growing group of HIV infections were married, faithful women.

Aha, there they go again! I thought to myself Judgmentalism is back!

But in truth, I was wrong again. The church was slow but the church got busy on this the leprosy of our age.

Love was on the move.

Mercy was on the move.

God was on the move.

Moving people of all kinds to work with others they had never met, never would have cared to meet… Conservative church groups hanging out with spokesmen for the gay community, all singing off the same hymn sheet on AIDS… Soccer moms and quarterbacks… hip-hop stars and country stars… This is what happens when God gets on the move: crazy stuff happens!

Popes were seen wearing sunglasses!

Jesse Helms was seen with a ghetto blaster!

Crazy stuff. Evidence of the spirit.

It was breathtaking. Literally. It stopped the world in its tracks.

When churches started demonstrating on debt, governments listened—and acted. When churches starting organising, petitioning, and even—that most unholy of acts today, God forbid, lobbying… on AIDS and global health, governments listened—and acted.

I’m here today in all humility to say: you changed minds; you changed policy; you changed the world.

Look, whatever thoughts you have about God, who He is or if He exists, most will agree that if there is a God, He has a special place for the poor. In fact, the poor are where God lives.

Check Judaism. Check Islam. Check pretty much anyone.

I mean, God may well be with us in our mansions on the hill… I hope so. He may well be with us as in all manner of controversial stuff… maybe, maybe not… But the one thing we can all agree, all faiths and ideologies, is that God is with the vulnerable and poor.

God is in the slums, in the cardboard boxes where the poor play house… God is in the silence of a mother who has infected her child with a virus that will end both their lives… God is in the cries heard under the rubble of war… God is in the debris of wasted opportunity and lives, and God is with us if we are with them. “If you remove the yolk from your midst, the pointing of the finger and speaking wickedness, and if you give yourself to the hungry and satisfy the desire of the afflicted, then your light will rise in darkness and your gloom with become like midday and the Lord will continually guide you and satisfy your desire in scorched places”

It’s not a coincidence that in the Scriptures, poverty is mentioned more than 2,100 times. It’s not an accident. That’s a lot of air time, 2,100 mentions. [You know, the only time Christ is judgmental is on the subject of the poor.] 'As you have done it unto the least of these my brethren, you have done it unto me.’ (Matthew 25:40). As I say, good news to the poor.

Here’s some good news for the President. After 9-11 we were told America would have no time for the World’s poor. America would be taken up with its own problems of safety. And it’s true these are dangerous times, but America has not drawn the blinds and double-locked the doors.

In fact, you have double aid to Africa. You have tripled funding for global health. Mr. President, your emergency plan for AIDS relief and support for the Global Fund—you and Congress—have put 700,000 people onto life-saving anti-retroviral drugs and provided 8 million bed nets to protect children from malaria.

Outstanding human achievements. Counterintuitive. Historic. Be very, very proud.

But here’s the bad news. From charity to justice, the good news is yet to come. There’s is much more to do. There’s a gigantic chasm between the scale of the emergency and the scale of the response.

And finally, it’s not about charity after all, is it? It’s about justice.

Let me repeat that: It’s not about charity, it’s about justice.

And that’s too bad.

Because you’re good at charity. Americans, like the Irish, are good at it. We like to give, and we give a lot, even those who can’t afford it.

But justice is a higher standard. Africa makes a fool of our idea of justice; it makes a farce of our idea of equality. It mocks our pieties, it doubts our concern, it questions our commitment.

6,500 Africans are still dying every day of a preventable, treatable disease, for lack of drugs we can buy at any drugstore. This is not about charity, this is about Justice and Equality.

Because there’s no way we can look at what’s happening in Africa and, if we’re honest, conclude that deep down, we really accept that Africans are equal to us. Anywhere else in the world, we wouldn’t accept it. Look at what happened in South East Asia with the Tsunami. 150, 000 lives lost to that misnomer of all misnomers, “mother nature”. In Africa, 150,000 lives are lost every month. A tsunami every month. And it’s a completely avoidable catastrophe.

It’s annoying but justice and equality are mates. Aren’t they? Justice always wants to hang out with equality. And equality is a real pain.

You know, think of those Jewish sheep-herders going to meet the Pharaoh, mud on their shoes, and the Pharaoh says, “Equal?” A preposterous idea: rich and poor are equal? And they say, “Yeah, 'equal,’ that’s what it says here in this book. We’re all made in the image of God.”

And eventually the Pharaoh says, “OK, I can accept that. I can accept the Jews—but not the blacks.”

“Not the women. Not the gays. Not the Irish. No way, man.”

So on we go with our journey of equality.

On we go in the pursuit of justice.

We hear that call in the ONE Campaign, a growing movement of more than two million Americans… left and right together… united in the belief that where you live should no longer determine whether you live.

We hear that call even more powerfully today, as we mourn the loss of Coretta Scott King—mother of a movement for equality, one that changed the world but is only just getting started. These issues are as alive as they ever were; they just change shape and cross the seas.

Preventing the poorest of the poor from selling their products while we sing the virtues of the free market… that’s a justice issue. Holding children to ransom for the debts of their grandparents… That’s a justice issue. Withholding life-saving medicines out of deference to the Office of Patents… that’s a justice issue.

And while the law is what we say it is, God is not silent on the subject.

That’s why I say there’s the law of the land… and then there is a higher standard. There’s the law of the land, and we can hire experts to write them so they benefit us, so the laws say it’s OK to protect our agriculture but it’s not OK for African farmers to do the same, to earn a living?

As the laws of man are written, that’s what they say.

God will not accept that.

Mine won’t, at least. Will yours?

[pause]

I close this morning on … very… thin… ice.

This is a dangerous idea I’ve put on the table: my God vs. your God, their God vs. our God… vs. no God. It is very easy, in these times, to see religion as a force for division rather than unity.

And this is a town—Washington—that knows something of division.

But the reason I am here, and the reason I keep coming back to Washington, is because this is a town that is proving it can come together on behalf of what the Scriptures call the least of these.

This is not a Republican idea. It is not a Democratic idea. It is not even, with all due respect, an American idea. Nor it is unique to any one faith.

Do to others as you would have them do to you.’ (Luke 6:30) Jesus says that.

'Righteousness is this: that one should… give away wealth out of love for Him to the near of kin and the orphans and the needy and the wayfarer and the beggars and for the emancipation of the captives.’ The Koran says that. (2.177)

Thus sayeth the Lord: 'Bring the homeless poor into the house, when you see the naked, cover him, then your light will break out like the dawn and your recovery will speedily spring fourth, then your Lord will be your rear guard.’ The jewish scripture says that. Isaiah 58 again.

That is a powerful incentive: 'The Lord will watch your back.’ Sounds like a good deal to me, right now.

A number of years ago, I met a wise man who changed my life. In countless ways, large and small, I was always seeking the Lord’s blessing. I was saying, you know, I have a new song, look after it… I have a family, please look after them… I have this crazy idea…

And this wise man said: stop.

He said, stop asking God to bless what you’re doing.

Get involved in what God is doing—because it’s already blessed.

Well, God, as I said, is with the poor. That, I believe, is what God is doing.

And that is what He’s calling us to do.

I was amazed when I first got to this country and I learned how much some churchgoers tithe. Up to ten percent of the family budget. Well, how does that compare the federal budget, the budget for the entire American family? How much of that goes to the poorest people in the world? Less than one percent.

Mr. President, Congress, people of faith, people of America:

I want to suggest to you today that you see the flow of effective foreign assistance as tithing…. Which, to be truly meaningful, will mean an additional one percent of the federal budget tithed to the poor.

What is one percent?

One percent is not merely a number on a balance sheet.

One percent is the girl in Africa who gets to go to school, thanks to you. One percent is the AIDS patient who gets her medicine, thanks to you. One percent is the African entrepreneur who can start a small family business thanks to you. One percent is not redecorating presidential palaces or money flowing down a rat hole. This one percent is digging waterholes to provide clean water.

One percent is a new partnership with Africa, not paternalism towards Africa, where increased assistance flows toward improved governance and initiatives with proven track records and away from boondoggles and white elephants of every description.

America gives less than one percent now. Were asking for an extra one percent to change the world. to transform millions of lives—but not just that and I say this to the military men now – to transform the way that they see us.

One percent is national security, enlightened economic self interest, and a better safer world rolled into one. Sounds to me that in this town of deals and compromises, one percent is the best bargain around.

These goals—clean water for all; school for every child; medicine for the afflicted, an end to extreme and senseless poverty—these are not just any goals; they are the Millennium Development goals, which this country supports. And they are more than that. They are the Beatitudes for a Globalised World.

Now, I’m very lucky. I don’t have to sit on any budget committees. And I certainly don’t have to sit where you do, Mr. President. I don’t have to make the tough choices.

But I can tell you this:

To give one percent more is right. It’s smart. And it’s blessed.

There is a continent—Africa—being consumed by flames.

I truly believe that when the history books are written, our age will be remembered for three things: the war on terror, the digital revolution, and what we did—or did not to—to put the fire out in Africa.

History, like God, is watching what we do.

Thank you. Thank you, America, and God bless you all.